HDE Advent Calendar Day 16: Playing with Cipher Notation

Hi, I'm Bumi from HDE's Cloud Product Development Division. Some of you may remember my post in last year's Advent Calendar. This year, I will write about something more or less related.

When hearing the word "cipher", probably some of us will remember something related to cryptography. Well, I hate to disappoint you, but this time the cipher I will discuss about is not related to anything about electronic security. However, the general meaning still sticks, which is something like "putting something into code". The something here is music, and the code here is the numbered musical notation, or "cipher notation", as some call it.

I have been working on an Angklung song arrangement for some time and I figured I could explain the difference between the notation generally used for angklung and the usual musical notation, which is quite different in shape but basically are just two different ways to express the same thing.

Western musical notation

f:id:tbumi:20171216112222p:plain

The picture above is an example of the usual musical notation we know. I refer to it as "western musical notation", because this kind of notation is generally used in the western world, as opposed to traditional asian music. Every note is described as a shape drawn on a collection of lines, called the staff. The length of the note is described by the shape of the note. The pitch of the note is described by the position of the "shape" on the staff. There are also "clefs" on the left side of the staff which basically tell us where the pitch of the lines is relative to the whole range of sounds we can make.

Since modern music notation processor software works with this kind of notation only, I have to write my arrangement with this kind of notation on a computer. However, angklung rehearsals do not use this kind of notation, but rather uses a different kind of notation (or "cipher", as I mentioned before).

Angklung musical notation (Cipher notation)

f:id:tbumi:20171216114829p:plain

The picture above is an example of cipher notation, written in a popular spreadsheet software. Although it looks completely different, the two kinds of notations describe the same thing (not in this particular example though, the two songs are different).

What I mean by the same thing, is that in here notes are represented as numbers rather than shapes. The numbers, from 1 to 7, represent the seven-note scale of the song (diatonic scale). They are often read as do-re-mi-fa-sol-la-si(ti), as you are probably familiar with those words. Dots above the numbers represent higher pitch, and dots below the numbers represent lower pitch. Numbers with "strikethrough" lines indicate flats or sharps.

The rows do not represent pitch, but actually are different notes played on the same "time". The direction of reading is similar, left to right to indicate the passage of time. In here, the duration of notes is indicated by dots and lines. Dots after the note means the note is played longer, while the lines above the notes indicate the note is divided into sub-rhythms.

From one notation to the other

So, is there a way to convert from one musical notation to the other? I have interest in this question since it is very useful for me. I usually make arrangements by composing them with a scorewriter software, which requires me to write it in western notation. By using a scorewriter software, I can listen to the computer-generated music as if it were played by an actual angklung orchestra (with the power of virtual instruments), and make edits to the music as needed.

After that, I have to give it to the angklung players to rehearse, and they need to read it in cipher notation. So, in my free time I wrote a simple computer script which reads music from the scorewriter software in MusicXML format, and converts it to cipher notation to be read in the "popular spreadsheet software" (you may have guessed what it is by now) which is generally used for reading and writing cipher notation.

Why two different notations?

You may wonder, why invent a completely different musical notation system if there is another more popular one ready? Well, the answer is that the needs of traditional asian instruments differ from western instruments. Western instruments tend to be played individually (one violin is played by one person), whereas this particular instument, angklung, is played together (the "angklung" is played by many people and you can't play it alone).

Another common argument is that the cipher notation is easier to read, and thus will attract more people to play angklung. Moreover, it will fit with one of the core principles of angklung, which is Mudah, or easy to understand. By using this kind of notation it will lower the so-called "barrier of entry" into playing angklung.

There may be different arguments related to why these notations are used, but the main point is different notations cater to different needs of different instruments. The cipher notation is actually really easy to use and read once you understand the situation it is used in.

So, how about we play angklung together some time? It is totally fun to experience! :)

HDE Advent Calendar Day 15: Why SpaceX was founded

Hi, I'm Kirby and I've had the pleasure to work at HDE as a GIP Intern over the last 7 weeks.

Thanks to the surprising amount of English in Tokyo and the HDE staff's astounding speed of transition from Japanese to English as a business language over the last 2-3 years, I find myself leaving Japan with my Japanese unimproved. I wouldn't have thought this possible before. While contemplating this, I dug up a short passage I wrote over a year ago while I was trying to learn Japanese.

At the time, I had just finished reading Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future written by Ashlee Vance and while surfing the net, I noticed that the Japanese wikipedia entry for Elon Musk didn't describe why Musk started SpaceX in the first place. Before the feel-good-inspiration imparted by the book faded away, I painstakingly tried to describe Musk's original motivation in Japanese but the result was riddled with awkward phrasing and grammatic errors. So to give it some justice, I'll write it again in English (translation: I ran out of ideas to write about thanks to the 2 MTS's and the HDE Medium blog post).

 

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/5174GQsw2oL._SX329_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

While Musk is mainly associated with SpaceX and Tesla nowadays, he actually started in the IT industry back in the dot-com era. At 24 years of age, Musk left his PhD program in applied physics and materials science at Stanford University in order to participate in the emerging internet phenomenon. A brief timeline of his endeavours is shown below:

  • 1995 - Musk and his brother, Kimbal founded Zip2 with US$28,000 given by their father.
  • 1999 February - Compaq acquired Zip2 for US$307 million in cash. Musk earned US$22 million while Kimbal earned US$15 million.
  • 1999 March - Musk co-founded X.com with US$10 million earned from Zip2
  • 2000 - X.com merged with Confinity which had a money transfer service called PayPal
  • 2001 - The merged company was renamed to PayPal
  • 2001 - eBay acquires PayPal for US$1.5 billion in stock. Musk earned around US$180 million

Having earned this much wealth at age 31, Musk then made a strange decision. He founded the space company, SpaceX in 2002. Traditionally, the space industry resided exclusively in the realm of governments. After all, the industry is extremely capital intensive and the liklihood of success is low. Neil deGrasse Tyson eloquently describes that here:

www.youtube.com

Naturally, most people, Elon included, figured the business would fail. So why did he risk his personal fortune then?

Before founding SpaceX, Musk's original goal was different. Whilst browsing NASA's website, he became confused over why there was no roadmap to sending people to Mars. Initially, he assumed that the reason was because NASA's budget was too low so they couldn't conduct the required research. To address this, Musk and several prominent figures in the aerospace industry came up with a project called "Mars Oasis".

The goal would be to launch a rocket with a small greenhouse containing dehydrated nutrient gel and seeds to Mars. Upon landing, the contraption would scoop in Martian soil and use it to grow a plant in. If it were to succeed, there would be money shots of a green plant growing against the red Martian background, and headlines like "The furthest life has ever travelled". Public interest in space would reignite and thus redirecting more tax revenue into funding NASA could be justified.

However, while researching the details and costs, which incidentally involved trying to buy 3 ICBMs from Russia, Musk eventually came to the conclusion that rocket costs were prohibitively expensive. Even with a reasonable increase in budget, NASA would remain incapable of attaining any sort of sustainable access to Mars. Not giving up, Musk, as he describes it, addressed the problem from first principles. He calculated that the cost of raw materials only made up 3% of the sales price of a rocket. With vertical integration, the construction costs could probably be reduced by up to an order of magnitude. But more significantly, the primary reason rockets are so expensive is because they are not reusable. All our modern forms of transportation are reusuable - airplanes, ships, cars, trains, you name it. Rockets are an astronomically expensive one way ticket. They would be launched once and the most expensive portion of the rocket, the first stage, would burn up in the atmosphere during re-entry and smash apart in the ocean. Rocket technology had truly stagnated since Apollo 11 landed Armstrong and Aldrin on the Moon back in 1969.

And so, Musk founded SpaceX in order to build reusable rockets. If they could get it to work, they would reduce space access costs by over a factor of 100. It's certainly an ambitious goal and a highly risky investment but then again, he had originally planned on spending a sizeable portion of his wealth on Mars Oasis, a philanthropic gesture which would have had a zero ROI.

Moving forward 7 years, 2008 would likely have been one of the worst years Musk experienced. SpaceX had failed to launch their rocket, the Falcon 1, three times, each with explosive results. The costs of these rockets had exhausted SpaceX's capital. At around the same time, Tesla, the electric car company Musk cofounded in 2003 was also facing bankruptcy. With the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 fresh on everyone's minds, finding new capital for two high risk businesses was difficult to say the least.

Faced with the imminent death of both companies, Musk agonized over the idea of having to invest all his remaining fortune into one of the two companies - which would maximize the chance of one company surviving, but guarantee the death of the other. However, unwillingly to give either up, he split his remaining wealth and invested in both companies to keep them afloat for a while longer. At this stage, Musk had to borrow money in order to pay off his rent. To add to the stress, Musk was also going through a very public divorce at the time.

Fortunately, on September 28, SpaceX managed to successfully reach orbit with their fourth Falcon 1, a milestone that had never been achieved by a private company before. Then, on December 23, SpaceX won a US$1.6 billion contract from NASA for twelve flights to the International Space Station. Had this fourth launch failed, SpaceX would no longer exist today.

While juggling all of this, Musk was also engaged in trying to secure a round of funding for Tesla. It culminated in a US$40 million funding round, half of which Musk put in. The deal was finalized on December 25, a few hours before Tesla would have gone bankrupt.

Fast foward to today, and I daresay Musk's companies are fending fairly well for themselves. SpaceX managed to succesfully reland a booster for the first time in history on April 18, 2014. Thus far, they have relanded 19 boosters out of 24 and relaunched and relanded 3 used boosters. Their launch frequency is also increasing quite rapidly, with 30 launches planned for 2018. Check out some stats here. SpaceX also do live web broadcasts of their launches so if you're interested in seeing one live, I'd suggest following them on Twitter for notifications.

On the other side, Tesla has also done fairly well with its Model S and Model X line. They have used the capital they earned from these models to build two Gigafactories, with several more planned for production. These Gigafactories will be essential for the mass production of the Model 3 and the Tesla battery. Whether they succeed at production of this scale remains to be seen but I'm certainly hoping they overcome the hurdles.

And that's it from me. I would recommend giving the biography a read. It almost reads as if it were some sort of movie script. https://www.amazon.co.jp/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/0062301233

And maybe one day, we'll see this happen.

www.youtube.com

Hopefully, we don't build Gundams after that and end up in a Earth-Mars interplanetary war though.

HDE Advent Calendar Day 14: Ballpark Drainage

Hi, everyone!
I'm Exzo.
I belong to the sales department in HDE, Inc.

This time I want to write about something that I’m most interested in recently, "Ballpark drainage!"

Since my life has been with no other interest than Baseball, it is unacceptable that I wouldn't be able to play Baseball on a rainy day, especially my day off.

It’s already been 2 years since I turned my baseball career as a player to a supporter of my son’s baseball life.

Thanks to all the skiiled baseball coaches, my son could happily play baseball!

f:id:naranara3:20171212165229j:plain

Again, for such a “baseball love” family, I truly can not believe that we wouldn’t be able to play baseball on a rainy day!!

When it rains for entire day, we courageously give up and switch our mind to practice under the girder bridge. However, when the rains stops shortly, I always strongly think "Ohhh I wish I could let my son play on the ballpark rather than under the bridge!!"
That is the parental love.

So at that time, we tried to drain off the muddy water by using drainage pump.

Has anyone ever used the drainage pump?

This drainage pump can drain muddy water so it is very convenient.
I’ve heard that this kind of machine originally used at a construction site, but it seems that also on the baseball field they perform very well.

f:id:naranara3:20171212165417j:plain

Therefore, Exzo has interest in a drainage pump and found out that there are two types of pumps which are for muddy water and freshwater.

By the way, freshwater drainage pump looks like below and mainly used for agricultural usage.

f:id:naranara3:20171212165539j:plain

In addition, this type of the pump are alsoused for water sprinklers at a ballpark during summer.

If you use this pump for muddy water; "It will break!!!!"

So as Exzo has interest in pumps, Exzo came up with this simple question
"espite the same precipitation, puddle amount are different for each ballpark."

So, to find an answer to this question, I became interested in Koshien, one of the most famous baseball filed in Japan. Koshien Baseball Park is managed by Hanshin Gardening and has recently been used for this year’s Professional Baseball Climax Series.

f:id:naranara3:20171212165706j:plain

I’ve found out some interesting points through my research.

☆ Shape of Ballpark ☆
It seems that the field itself has gentle slopes, from the center of pitcher’s mound towards the outfield (Naturally, the water will flow towards outfield.)

☆ A Soil of Ballpark ☆
The soils are mixture of fine black clay and rough particles of sand.
When the black soil contains moisture, it becomes sticky. (It will become mud when it rains.)
So that sands are necessary to prevent the soil from becoming muddy.
It seems that black soils takes the majority of the soil because it does not tighten if there is too much sand.

☆ Staff Members who maintains the Ballpark Ground ☆
Usually, about five people and when it becomes permanent staff it will be about two people.
It seems that there are currently 14 staffs in Koshien.

This maintenance method seems to be unrealistic when I try to implement it to our own field, so I tried to think from more realistic point of view.

"By the way, farmersmight be sufferring from the same problem..."

So I googled "Any chemical that could loosen the ground".

And I found out that there is a product called "EB - a"

f:id:naranara3:20171212165812j:plain

"OMG This is the one !"

"Sudden purchase!"

So, now I am looking forward to receiving EB - a!

Summary
-There are pumps for freshwater and muddy water.
-If you accidentally use the pumps for freshwater to the dirty water, the machine will break.
- The ground maintenance method of Hanshin Gardening is incredibly wonderful, but it is not a realistic solution for ordinary people.
- Please wait for the breaking news about EB-a’s effectiveness.

I hope you have a wonderful time.